Team Communication & Conflict Resolution
Practice clarifying disagreements, listening and agreeing on workable actions. This is not a substitute for formal handling of harassment, threats or other serious misconduct.
0/4 lessons complete · Best assessment: 0% · Project pending
01 · Facts, interpretations and interestsOpen lesson

Separate observed events from interpretations and desired outcomes. People may disagree about the same situation because they have different information or priorities. Ask what each person needs rather than assuming the loudest position describes the whole problem. An interest is the underlying concern; a position is the solution someone initially demands.
Two workers want the same shift for different caregiving and training needs.
Try it yourself
Describe the facts and interests in a fictional disagreement.
02 · Listening and clarificationOpen lessonLocked — complete previous lessons

Summarize what you heard and ask whether you understood correctly. Use open questions and allow the person to explain constraints. Listening does not require agreeing with every claim. Avoid interrupting to prepare a rebuttal, and check important facts independently when the disagreement depends on uncertain information.
It sounds as though the handoff deadline is the main concern; is that right?
Try it yourself
Draft two neutral clarification questions.
03 · Options and agreementsOpen lessonLocked — complete previous lessons

Generate alternatives before selecting one. Compare options against the relevant constraints and avoid a vague compromise that no one can carry out. An agreement should identify actions, owners, timing and a review point. Confirm that participants understand it and that it fits the organization’s rules.
A rota trial covers both needs for two weeks and is reviewed after actual use.
Try it yourself
Write a specific agreement for the scheduling scenario.
04 · Limits and formal processesOpen lessonLocked — complete previous lessons

Some conflicts involve unequal power, misconduct or safety concerns that should not be treated as a routine disagreement. Use designated reporting and support routes. A person should not be pressured into informal mediation when it is inappropriate. Document relevant facts and avoid promises of confidentiality you cannot keep.
A threat is referred to the appropriate safety process rather than handled as a personality clash.
Try it yourself
Complete the conflict project and identify a formal escalation condition.