Critical Thinking & Cognitive Biases
Recognize common reasoning traps and practice evaluating claims. Bias awareness is a tool for checking your own thinking, not a label for dismissing everyone who disagrees.
0/4 lessons complete · Best assessment: 0% · Project pending
01 · Claims and evidenceOpen lesson

A claim says something is true; evidence offers reasons to believe it. Identify the exact claim and what evidence would change your mind. Distinguish an anecdote from a comparison involving many observations. Check the source, method and relevance rather than accepting a confident tone as proof. A weak argument can still point to a question worth investigating.
One customer’s success story does not establish that a product works for most users.
Try it yourself
Rewrite a vague claim so it could be checked.
02 · Confirmation and availabilityOpen lessonLocked — complete previous lessons

Confirmation bias involves favoring information that supports an existing belief. Availability can make vivid or recent examples feel more representative than they are. Deliberately look for disconfirming evidence and ask whether memorable cases reflect the wider pattern. These tendencies can affect anyone, including the person evaluating the claim.
After hearing about one dramatic failure, a learner checks broader results rather than assuming it is typical.
Try it yourself
List evidence that would challenge your first view of a fictional claim.
03 · Anchors, framing and base ratesOpen lessonLocked — complete previous lessons

An initial number can anchor later judgment even when it is weakly relevant. Framing changes how equivalent information is presented. Base rates describe how common something is before considering a specific case. Compare alternatives on consistent terms and ask whether a striking individual story fits the underlying frequency.
A sale price is evaluated against comparable products, not only the seller’s claimed original price.
Try it yourself
Describe how a price anchor could influence a fictional purchase.
04 · Reasoning under uncertaintyOpen lessonLocked — complete previous lessons

Separate what is known, inferred and unknown. Consider multiple explanations and avoid absolute language when evidence is limited. A decision can still be necessary without complete certainty; record assumptions and review the result later. Treat corrections as improvements in reasoning rather than personal defeat.
A learner says the evidence suggests an effect, but the sample and comparison leave important uncertainty.
Try it yourself
Complete the claim audit and state one limitation.